Concur executive vice president of supplier management and travel management company services Mike Koetting talks:
• Lag time on airline integration
• Is using TripLink an endorsement of supplier-direct
booking?
• Connecting to Lufthansa
Air supplier integrations with TripLink will start going
live soon, Mike Koetting told BTN payment
and expense editor JoAnn DeLuna, joining hotels, car rental suppliers and
travel management companies. That piece of the puzzle will bring Concur's tool
closer to its hyped purpose: pooling data booked outside corporate booking
tools to give travel buyers a view on the full trip.
BTN: Is TripLink where
you want it to be?
Koetting: By now,
we have all the major car rental suppliers confirmed to participate and three
of the four leading hotel brands in the U.S.: Marriott, Starwood and IHG. United
[will be] the first carrier going live, in the relatively near future. Air
Canada and Lufthansa [are] following. We have European suppliers participating
with the expansion of TripLink into Europe. We also have 13 travel management
companies that are live, participating and integrated with TripLink. We have
momentum in all three areas—over 6,000 clients that have purchased TripLink.
Having said that, there's still a lot of work to be done. We're still rounding
out the U.S. with a few more airlines and hotels. Western Europe is probably a
primary focus in the next year with a couple more carriers and hotels. I
suspect we'll look to Australia and perhaps Asia after that. But right now we're
focusing on rounding out the U.S. and Western Europe.
BTN: In the United
States, car rental and hotel suppliers are up and running on TripLink. Why does
it take so long to get airlines going?
Koetting: [For
United] that's a timeline they control in their development teams, but I know
they're far along. It's really a function of the airlines' legacy systems. Some
airlines have approached the integration with TripLink as one part of a broader
reengineering effort that they're doing at their websites, but it requires that
the airlines coordinate the development teams for their websites, loyalty
programs and e-commerce. All those areas have to collaborate to create a
solution. Some suppliers have found the integration to be quite easy and
straightforward. Uber and Airbnb are examples of suppliers that integrated
quite quickly.
BTN: TripLink is
meant to bring out-of-channel bookings home to travel buyers, and Concur recently
sponsored a Global Business Travel Association survey that found that travelers
were less satisfied with online booking tools from their companies or TMCs than
with other booking options. What does Concur take away from that?
Koetting: One: There's
always room for improvement for Concur and our peers to continue to improve the
online booking tool experience. Some of the things we've developed in just the
last year regarding the fare-families functionality help make the tool more
compelling for travelers. Second, it speaks to the continuing need for travel
management programs to find a way to capture the spend that happens at the supplier-direct
sites. It yet again reinforces the need for a solution like TripLink.
BTN: Is the volume
coming from supplier-direct sites significant?
Koetting: We've seen
tremendous growth in the number of TripLink bookings coming into the Concur
system. Today, the majority of those bookings are still travelers forwarding
itinerary confirmations to Concur or TripIt. As suppliers come onboard, the
number of supplier bookings increases fairly dramatically, albeit from a very
low base. IHG has been out there now for two years; Marriott just came on board;
Starwood a year ago.
BTN: Some say tools
like TripLink actually encourage travelers to book out of channel.
Koetting: We're
really not trying to encourage people one way or another to go to supplier
sites. We're simply saying that if they choose to go to a supplier site, they
should be able to get a corporate discount and the information should come back
[to the corporate]. When we started this conversation three years ago and we
sort of mislabeled it "open booking," travel managers were initially
very resistant to acknowledging that there was this issue [of invisible spend].
Now, almost every travel manager understands and acknowledges that there's some
degree of invisible spend in their program. There was a concern that somehow
embracing TripLink implied that the company was endorsing supplier-direct
booking. That's probably the biggest and last myth that we have to overcome. Just
because your company enables TripLink in an effort to gain visibility to
supplier-direct bookings does not imply an endorsement of supplier-direct
booking.
BTN: So what will it
take to overcome this myth?
Koetting: We're
beginning to roll out reports that help clients see the scope of invisible
spend in their program. [They show] how much travelers expensed in air, how
much they booked through Concur travel, and here's the gap that's invisible. We're
providing those reports for air, hotel and car and rail. It helps grow awareness
of the scope of invisible spend within our clients. That's a great way to start
the conversation without necessarily encouraging more supplier-direct spend. There
are some clients who do have more of an openness to open booking, but most
clients are still primarily focused on just getting visibility to the existing
blind spend. We've reached critical mass—in terms of supplier participation,
TMC integration and now clients who have purchased the product—that we should start
seeing an accelerated adoption of TripLink and greater visibility of
participating customers over blind spend.
BTN: What about
Lufthansa, which is chasing a direct-connect strategy?
Koetting:
We're actively partnered with Lufthansa on
proving out the best path forward for clients and TMCs. We can support
Lufthansa via Travelfusion [Concur's access point for content from low-cost
carriers and direct connects] today, but the TMCs need to do significant
implementation on their side. That has been the gating factor in going to
market within the online booking tool. Generally speaking, we pursue a direct
connect in Concur Travel if that content is not available via GDS. If it's not
available in the GDS and it's relevant business travel content, then we will
secure a direct connect.