Unilever's Yvonne Moya does not sit in procurement. As the
director of global travel, event and fleet services, she reports to
Unilever's CFO function through the company's Workplace organization. Still, she partners closely with procurement to deliver an
effective travel program.
The program looked best-in-class on paper. "We had
ticked all boxes, like in the schoolbook" she said, reciting a list of
procurement best practices: "We had consolidated the program with the TMC,
hotels and airlines. We were negotiating with all of our suppliers to make sure
we had the best deals." Yet there remained a lack of traveler engagement
with the program that Moya wanted to change.
"We needed to look at [the travel program] within the
evolving consumer environment, not just from a travel perspective," she
said. "Unilever is a consumer products company. We want to be faster to
the market, be tech savvy, personalize to the customer. When we looked at the
program from that perspective, we came back with an interesting analysis."
Moya's travel management team and procurement counterparts
uncovered deficiencies on several fronts. There was lack of awareness around
the travel program, a dense and repetitive travel policy and a weak
communications strategy.
On the supply side, the service configuration at the travel
management company was outdated, with expensive agency implants in some of
Unilever's 90 markets. Global travel manager Kristian Collard pegged hotel
leakage at 50 percent, while global category leader for indirect procurement
Philipp Brunner said expense report analysis showed off-channel hotel bookings
often realized savings against negotiated rates.
Even as traveler satisfaction and engagement motivated Moya,
Unilever's zero-based budgeting demanded savings to justify initiatives. As a
result, traveler-friendly technology solutions also had to be budget friendly,
and innovative procurement strategies would be critical.
Getting Travelers' Attention
In any effort to drive traveler experience, getting
travelers' attention has to come first. "We had no brand and very little
awareness around who we were as team and what we could offer," she said. "So
that's where we started. We had to work more as a marketing company and not as
travel managers."
That meant interacting with travelers in formats they liked
and in locations they frequented. Which meant looking at the 28-page travel
policy, cutting it to the bone and reintroducing it with a lighter tone and a
visual presentation. Which meant booting up an internal social media tool and
nurturing engagement with frequent communications.
"It was super frustrating," said Moya. The
learning curve was steep. "We had 10 people in this social media
group—ourselves. It took us over half a year to learn and to constantly bang
the drum and know how to post, how much, what is too much, what is too little."
After a year, however, social media followers numbered 16,000 employees who
travel regularly and travel arrangers.
"We now have posters and other communications vehicles,"
said Moya. "We push out short messages on social media." Above all,
she said, people want simple, short messaging and the relevance has to be
clear. "They want to know immediately, 'What's in it for me?'"
Understanding how to answer that question laid the foundation for effective
supply-side changes.
What’s in It for Travelers?
- Quicker response times
- New chat capability
- 24/7 service
Turning to Tech at the TMC
While Unilever consolidated its agency business with HRG
years ago, the company still had implants: three in the U.K., more in the
Netherlands and others dotting Europe. In addition to taking up valuable
Unilever real estate, implants equal "a fixed fee regardless of whether we
used the service or not," said Collard, who noted that Unilever travel
volume had dropped, by design, over the years. "We needed a
transaction-fee model, and we needed better technology solutions."
That's easy to say but challenging to deliver for Unilever
travelers, who speak multitudes of languages and have been accustomed to agents
with local knowledge. Moya wanted a system that not only maintained these
nuances but also reduced costs, extended calling hours and offered multichannel
communication that included a chat option. "I've seen other companies
consolidate into physical hubs," she said. "We didn't need to
physically locate everything. There had to be a more clever way to keep costs
down, keep the local nuances and keep local ticketing. So I challenged HRG with
that."
HRG returned to Moya with what Unilever now calls its V-Hub,
or Virtual Hub, model. "We proposed a hub in each region [with] a virtual
network of agents connected to those hubs," said Alex Singleton, who leads
key client relationships at HRG. The virtual team is not limited to taking
inquiries from a particular location and is not limited to a particular GDS. In
addition, the technology routes inquiries to the best hub available, depending
on origination point. If an agent who speaks the local language is available,
the inquiry is routed there. If not, it is routed to an English speaker.
Sometimes, the routing is based on cost considerations, said
Moya. "For example, Switzerland was expensive operationally. If I sit in
Switzerland, I have a Swiss number to call but now I end up in the U.K."
When the rollout is complete—Unilever started in Europe, prioritizing the U.K.
and the Netherlands due to the number of implants, and North America will be
next—HRG will support Unilever travelers with 24/7 global connectivity on a
communications platform that integrates telephone, email and webchat
capabilities. Moya is quick to point out that it's not chatbot technology, but
she's got her eye on those developments.
The rollout has been a huge success, said Collard, noting an
impressive "don't quote me on this" savings number from just one of
the European offices. From a traveler experience perspective, he said, it's a
no-news-is-good-news situation. "With service changes like this, you
always have to measure it on the negative side of things. We've not had any
negative feedback, so that's very good."
What’s in It for Travelers?
- Improved pricing
- Less frustration, more choice
- Duty of care, disruption services
- Potential access to agency waivers &
favors
Traveler-Friendly Hotel Program
As at many companies, Unilever's hotel program formed a
particular weak spot. "The program was too limited," Collard said. "We
were telling travelers, 'You've only got this hotel or these in the program,'
but [the properties] didn't fit with what the traveler needed. Or, they felt
the choices were too expensive for their budgets. That drove a lot of people to
book outside the program."
Brunner said: "Through expense data, we saw the
noncompliant hotel spend and cross-referenced that data with the preferred
channel. When people shopped and booked outside [the preferred channel], they
were spending less money." Plus, said Moya, "Our road warriors in the
U.S., Brazil and Germany don't want to go to the Hiltons [and]
InterContinentals of the world. They want to go to the bed-and-breakfasts and
the guesthouses in India."
Taking those findings as the impetus for a new strategy,
Moya, Brunner and their teams determined that providing a combination of more
choice and less direction could drive savings. But how would Unilever provide
choice without diluting volume with preferred suppliers? Did TMC hotel content
cast a wide enough net to expand hotel choice in a meaningful way? If not, it
remained an imperative for the hotel program to drive all bookings through the
TMC to ensure duty of care, service benefits and disruption support for
Unilever travelers. "Unilever's strategy is to go through the TMC,"
said Moya. "We had to find a way to expand choice without opening the
booking channel."
Sourcing for Choice
Moya turned to HRS to explore a potential partnership. The
self-described hotel solutions provider fills a niche in the corporate travel
industry: a hotel content aggregator for corporates looking for hotel inventory
not provided in global distribution platforms that also operates as an umbrella
brand and distribution partner for independent hotels. It provides sourcing
solutions for corporate clients and has incorporated payment functions and
personalization apps as enhancements. Unilever has worked with HRS in Germany
for years, but the provider's expanded global strategy and capability to
integrate aggregated hotel content into GDSs spurred Moya to look into a deeper
relationship.
"It was not just a portal," she said. "HRS
now acts as a hotel chain within the GDS. They seed rates and content for their
hotel partners. We found that very interesting because the GDS content was
really lacking but HRS could offer all these additional properties without
leaving the TMC environment."
Content by itself does not make for a successful procurement
strategy; you have to look at rate, location, the services the property is able
to deliver. That said, the Unilever team knew its negotiated rates weren't
necessarily delivering the best value. "The market has become so dynamic
with hotels changing the prices frequently and implementing very sophisticated
yield management strategies," Moya said. "In most markets, the best
buy [on a given day] is pretty good," but major markets were a different
story. "In the Londons, New Yorks and Singapores of the world, the
negotiated rate is best."
Unilever landed on a hybrid solution. Going against
conventional procurement best practices, it broadened the selection of
preferred hotels in its top 30 markets and opted out of last room availability
there. While Unilever strongly encourages travelers to use preferred hotels in
these markets, it's not required. Instead, those booking outside preferred
properties must abide by a Unilever rate cap assigned to the city or country,
and travelers must book through the TMC or online booking tool. HRS estimated
it has opened up 75,000 to 80,000 more properties to Unilever travelers on a
global basis to support the new strategy. According to managing
director corporate solutions in the headquarters region Dirk Schmidt, it wasn't just about that volume.
"Unilever did their research... to prove we could
deliver the value," he said.
That kind of research was critical to success, since Unilever didn't pilot the program to test the strategy. Rather, the company modeled a lot of data, Brunner said. "We had consolidated
agency data from HRG. HRS was able to deliver data from their hotel [partners].
And, of course we had the expense management data. With in-depth analysis, we
built the scenarios. ... The data determined where we pursued preferred
agreements, how we structured negotiations for hotel chain deals, and the rate
caps. It was critical to model these scenarios to show that we were minimizing
risk." Early numbers showed leakage rates already are declining, and Moya
expects that to continue now that new rates and preffereds were loaded in
January.
The Broader Trend
"We needed to listen to our travelers and deliver a
next-generation program," said Moya. Unilever's program already had moved
away from a "price, price, price" strategy, but Moya underscored that
realizing efficiencies for the company doesn't have to mean trouble for
travelers.
According to HRG's Singleton, Unilever is not unique in its
efforts to identify creative sourcing strategies that will support
traveler-friendly services. "A number of HRG clients are looking at these
strategies, but you have to have trust in your travelers and want to give them
the ability to control their decisions," he said. "Unilever made the
bold decision to take action."
HRS's Schmidt agreed. "Many companies
think, 'If I procure more, I control more,' but it's easy to over-procure. The
innovation at Unilever is that they found a way to let go of that tendency and
allow individuals to make travel decisions that are right for the business."
Correction Feb. 28: A previous version of this article stated that Yvonne Moya reported directly to the CFO. Moya reports to the CFO function through Unilever's Workplace organization.