The Greenhouse Gas
Protocol released new standards meant to help organizations report their GHG
emissions, including the environmental impact of business travel. Developed by
the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable
Development, the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard includes guidance on
how to calculate and track emissions from air travel, car rentals, business
vehicle use and rail trips. As expected, GHG emissions calculations related to employees' hotel stays are addressed only as an optional element.
According to GHG Protocol,
"often, the majority of total corporate emissions come from scope 3
sources," which generally are considered indirect emissions "that are
a consequence of the activities of the reporting company, but occur at sources
owned or controlled by another company," including travel suppliers.
The Corporate Value
Chain Standard encompasses 15 categories of scope 3 activities, including
business travel, defined as "transportation of employees for
business-related activities during the reporting year (in vehicles not owned or
operated by the reporting company)."
One example of
"primary data" used to calculate business travel emissions is
"carrier-specific emissions factors," derived from an airline's fuel
consumption per passenger on a given flight. An example of "secondary
data" is the estimated distance traveled.
The Corporate Value
Chain Standard also addresses employee commuting, which may generate emissions
from sources similar to those included in the business travel category, but
also may cover buses, for example.
GHG Protocol cautioned
that changes to an organization's scope 3 inventory "over time may not
always correspond to actual changes in GHG emissions to the atmosphere. ... For
example, a reduction in business travel would reduce a company's scope 3
emissions from business travel. However, how a reduction in business travel
actually translates into a change in GHG emissions to the atmosphere depends on
several factors, including whether another person takes the 'empty seat' or
whether the unused seat contributes to reduced air traffic over the longer
term. Generally, as long as the accounting of scope 3 emissions over time
recognizes activities that in aggregate change global emissions, any such
concerns should not inhibit companies from reporting and tracking their scope 3
emissions over time."
GHG Protocol developed
the new standards, which also include the Product Life Cycle Standard, by
collecting feedback from more than 2,300 business leaders, non-governmental
organizations, academics and policymakers from 55 countries. Sixty companies
"road-tested" the new standards.
"These standards
are a breakthrough for business," according to a statement attributed to WRI
interim president Manish Bapna. "For the first time, companies will be
able to measure and manage the full scope of emissions in their value chain and
products, so they can take advantage of new opportunities as they reduce
greenhouse gases. The new standards will help move businesses and reporting
programs to one harmonized global reporting framework."