DOT Tentatively Denies Delta, Virgin Blue Transpacific Venture - Business Travel News

Share this page

Text size: A A A

DOT Tentatively Denies Delta, Virgin Blue Transpacific Venture

September 08, 2010 - 04:00 PM ET

By Jay Boehmer

The U.S. Department of Transportation on Wednesday tentatively denied an antitrust-immune joint venture proposed in July 2009 between Delta Air Lines and the Australia-based Virgin Blue Group, citing little public benefit to the proposed arrangement.

DOT in its tentative decision concluded that "the applicants have not adequately shown that a grant of antitrust immunity will allow the proposed alliance to produce sufficient additional public benefits," such as the increased capacity, reduced fares and more efficient services upon which the joint venture was proposed.

Newcomers last year to U.S.-Australia routes, Delta and the Virgin group announced plans to form their joint venture as a competitive alternative to Qantas Airlines and United Airlines, the carriers with the highest marketshare between the two countries. The carriers proposed immunity from antitrust laws so they could jointly cooperate "in the areas of planning, revenue and pricing, yield management, marketing and operations." The structure is similar to joint ventures that have grown prominent among alliance partners on the U.S.-EU routes. 

DOT said it accepting comments from interested parties, and will accept objections to its tentative decision over the next two weeks, after which it would issue a final decision.

"We strongly believe our proposed alliance with the Virgin Blue Group will be good for consumers," Delta said in statement. "We are reviewing the DOT's tentative order and will respond within the comment period."

Even though the Australia Competition and Consumer Commission last December approved the joint venture, DOT in its tentative decision said there would be barriers to Delta integrating with Virgin Blue carriers, which include V Australia, Virgin Blue and Pacific Blue Airlines in Australia and New Zealand.

Among its objections, DOT said, "the applicants have virtually no experience as commercial partners and employ business processes that they admit are not compatible. In brief, they have only just begun to explore the feasibility of arms-length cooperation," which includes such activities as codesharing and joint marketing, which do not require antitrust immunity.

Additionally, DOT argued, Delta and the Virgin carriers "have elected to limit the scope of their cooperation to focus primarily upon the 'trunk routes' between the U.S. and Australia," which DOT said is too limited to realize public benefits.

This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy. Purchase Reprint

Leave your comment:

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus