Airlines, GDSs In Contention Over Full Content Definition - Business Travel News

Share this page

Text size: A A A

Airlines, GDSs In Contention Over Full Content Definition

August 10, 2010 - 05:55 PM ET

By Jay Boehmer

Major domestic airlines and global distribution system providers appear to be at odds over whether full content agreements cover ancillary services, adding a potential obstacle to ongoing efforts to make a la carte airline services available through corporate and agency channels.

The full content agreements under which both parties continue to operate largely were forged in 2006, before the current wave of unbundling and merchandizing hit the domestic industry. While the contractual language and terms remain obscured to other industry participants in a cloud of nondisclosure agreements, conversations with airlines, GDSs and other industry participants show some variance in interpretation of the definition of "full content."

Sabre vice president of marketing Kyle Moore said solving issues related to ancillary airline fees is, for Sabre, more of "a technology question" than a content question, as some have surmised, and Sabre therefore would not have to modify air contracts to enable shopping, booking and fulfilling ancillary fees.

"Our view would be that our contracts already govern this content and that we would simply need to figure out the appropriate technological way to introduce it to our booking path." Moore added, "Just because the airlines have unbundled their products doesn't mean we have to."

Cyril Tetaz, head of marketing for airline distribution with Amadeus, struck a similar chord in the global distribution player's interpretation of "full content." Said Tetaz: "Whenever we negotiate full content agreements, we include ancillary services as well. That was the case in the past, and for Amadeus, we believe the full content definition we have covers ancillary services, and we've made even more clarification in the past year when we underwent negotiations," Tetaz said, noting recent content agreements with several major European carriers, including Iberia, Air France and Lufthansa.

ARC vice president of sales, marketing and customer care Mike Premo, who along with corporate travel buyers and agencies sits in the middle of the airlines and GDSs on the supply chain, said, "I'm not sure the carriers share that interpretation of full content."

Though other major domestic carriers would not provide comment on their interpretation of what, if any, ancillary services are included in "full content" deals with the GDSs, American Airlines vice president of sales and general sales manager Kurt Stache was unequivocal in sharing his carrier's own interpretation. "American Airlines is not, and has never been, contractually required to provide the GDSs access to non-fare products and services," Stache said in a statement. The carrier has been pushing its own direct connect offering as its preferred way for travel agencies to purchase some ancillary services.

Congress To The Rescue?

If their contracts don't compel carriers to provide GDSs with ancillary fee data, perhaps regulators will. That issue, and others that surround a la carte airline pricing took center stage during a House Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee on aviation hearing in Washington, D.C., last month. While there, the U.S. Government Accountability Office as well as members of Congress joined a few industry groups in calling for regulations to force airlines to disclose ancillary service fees through all distribution channels.

A GAO study prepared for that hearing recommended that the U.S. Department of Transportation require airlines to "disclose baggage fees and policies along with fare information such that this information can be consistently disclosed across all distribution channels used by the airline," a principle endorsed by representatives for the American Society of Travel Agents, the Interactive Travel Services Association and the Business Travel Coalition during testimony. Joining in the chorus, Rep. James Oberstar (D-Minn.) concluded a four-minute admonishment on ancillary airline fees by calling the GAO recommendations on disclosure "a starting point."

DOT is examining such a proposal in its latest round of passenger protection rules, released in June and slated for enactment by year-end, but not before the end of a 180-day comment that began with a notice of proposed rulemaking on June 2.

DOT general counsel Robert Rivkin during the hearing said the department plans to enact the rules, as shaped by comments, by the end of the year. He said, "The department proposes to require airlines to provide their agents and global distribution systems complete, accurate and up-to-date information on ancillary fees so that the information is readily available to consumers."

In a survey of 86 corporate travel managers submitted by BTC as part of chairman Kevin Mitchell's testimony, 95 percent said they would support such a requirement that airlines make ancillary fee data available through global distribution systems. BTC's survey found that all of the travel manager respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that, "unbundling and ancillary fees have caused serious problems for corporate travel programs." Further, the survey found that 86 percent of the travel buyers "believe that airlines, absent government regulation, will not make fair, adequate and readily accessible disclosure of their extra fees and charges so that travel managers and/or their TMCs can do comparison shopping of the all-in prices for air travel across carriers."

Industry Works On Solutions

Contractual and congressional issues aside, technology issues remain underdeveloped to fully enable ancillary services to be sold through the GDSs. Still, some in the industry have pinned their hopes to sell and track ancillary services through the corporate channel on the electronic miscellaneous document—a solution that has been likened to an electronic ticket and has been embraced by ARC, the International Air Transport Association, some payment systems, all the major GDSs and a number of airlines.

The GDSs are targeting this year as doable timing to bring the EMD into corporate travel channels. "The technology is there," Amadeus' Tetaz said. "What is at stake is more a change management and adoption issue. It does take time to adopt the technology and appreciate the impact on your operations, whether you're an airline or a travel agency. That is what's happening right now."

Amadeus last month said it is piloting a shopping and booking facility with the small French airline Corsairfly that can be used both on the carrier's website and by travel agents through global distribution systems, while it also has worked with Finnair as the first airline to issue, store, manage and distribute electronic miscellaneous documents using Amadeus technology.

A timetable of the third quarter of 2010 long has been targeted for achieving this goal, though there remain suggestions the date will slip. Tetaz told Business Travel News that Amadeus will begin piloting EMDs with agency customers in November, adding that much will depend on the readiness of each national billing and settlement plan to handle EMDs.

"BSP readiness varies on a market-by-market basis, just as was the case with e-ticketing," he said.

Sabre last month unveiled a placeholder solution with its Total Pricing initiative, which the GDS said would enable travel agents and other bookers to see the true cost of an airline itinerary, inclusive of any applicable add-on fees—from baggage fees to seat assignments—before booking a flight. Moore said Sabre is on pace to deliver the next, and more complicated, step of enabling booking, payment, settlement and fulfillment through the global distribution system channel by year-end.

"We're rapidly moving down the path of enabling all of the payment and fulfillment of all of the ancillaries as well," Moore said. "ARC and all of the BSPs around the world are moving toward 4Q 2010 timeframes for introduction of EMD settlement. We intend to get our EMD capabilities out there to the agency community in roughly the same timeline."

Moore added, "The booking capabilities are moving down toward a fourth-quarter delivery as well, and that would be across multiple ancillary types. We absolutely expect that to happen in the travel agency channel beginning this year."

As for ARC's own schedule in enabling electronic miscellaneous documents as the U.S. bank settlement plan, Premo said, "We're still on schedule for an end of third-quarter, early fourth-quarter rollout, but we're really not going to see a whole lot of these unless the carriers make the content available, so at the moment, the only public conversations have been the American-Farelogix connection. We've been working closely with them, so when American is ready to make that available we'll be ready to process it, and if agents are using Farelogix for that then we'll be able to close the loop."

—Amon Cohen contributed to this story.

This story originally appeared in the August 9, 2010, edition of Business Travel News.

This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy. Purchase Reprint

Leave your comment:

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus