Surcharge Irks Swedish Buyers
October 19, 2009 - 12:00 AM ET
By Amon Cohen
Travel managers reacted angrily to the news that Air France-KLM on Dec. 1 will introduce a surcharge of 75 Swedish kroner (US$10.83) on card payments processed via the two airlines' merchant agreements. Electrolux corporate travel manager Jo-Achim Hamburger, in fact, told BTN he would either stop using Air France and KLM in Sweden or switch to an invoicing arrangement with Electrolux's travel management company.
In a letter sent to travel agents on Oct. 1, Noud Duyzings, Air France-KLM country manager for Sweden, said the surcharge will apply to all transactions issued in Sweden by any IATA travel agency. Unlike the €7.50 surcharge introduced by KLM on lower fare classes in the Netherlands on Aug. 4, this surcharge will apply to all fares and booking classes. The only exceptions are corporate net fares, infant fares and miscellaneous documents. However, around half of all fares sold by major TMCs are corporate net fares.
Air France-KLM's Duyzings wrote that "the surcharge calculation and collection process will be fully automated in the GDS." He said no surcharge would be imposed for payments via travel agencies' own merchant agreements, the method by which corporate net fares are usually paid.
Electrolux's Hamburger opposes the surcharge because it penalizes good business practice. "A surcharge on cards is insane because it is the most efficient tool for payment," he said. "The airline does not need receivables if a card is used. It receives payment three days later."
Hamburger said the exemption for corporate net fares is of little comfort because Electrolux uses them much less than in the past. "I don't need unrestricted fares anymore," he said.
Swedish Business Travel Association chairman Peter Borg told BTN, "SBTA does not yet have an official view on this specific matter. However, we are generally very concerned with fees and surcharges. The cost will always in the end be paid by the customer, and fees and surcharges make it more difficult to overview final costs when comparing prices on the market."
Air France-KLM said the surcharge is part of a cost-efficiency program. "Credit card costs have become a major distribution cost for AF/KL due to the steep growth of card use over the past few years," said a spokeswoman. "The use of credit cards is very cost-inefficient for AF/KL because IATA has a very cost-efficient payment settlement system in place, called Bank Settlement Plan.
"AF/KL accepts the costs that are related to the payment facilities (via BSP), but all other benefits should be charged to the party which enjoys the benefits. As card companies are not willing to unbundle their product and distribute the charges in line with who receives the benefits, AF/KL has no other option than to surcharge. AF/KL continues to look for developments for a fair distribution of costs and benefits that would make the surcharge no longer necessary."
The spokeswoman added that corporate customers might consider settlement via debit card or online transfer, and that Sweden has a particularly high percentage of settlement by credit card through airline merchant agreements. This may be connected with the fact that IATA reduced BSP settlement terms for agents in Sweden from monthly to fortnightly this year, and may be moving to weekly settlement starting Jan. 1, 2010. The shorter settlement terms will make TMCs reluctant to move from card settlement to invoicing with corporate clients.
KLM said it has not yet decided whether to introduce the surcharge in more countries. One travel management company executive told BTN that "it may only be possible in the Netherlands, Sweden, the U.K. and Switzerland. These are the countries which have not prohibited discrimination between payment methods as laid down in the European Payment Services Directive."
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy. Purchase Reprint